Is There a White Rose in the Cuban Future?

Is there a Cuban anywhere, either on the island or abroad, that isn’t pondering what effect the death of Fidel Castro will have on their lives? Read this article by Robert Freer to find out his thoughts on this coming event.

By: Robert E. Freer, Jr., President of The Free Enterprise Foundation

In a hospital room 200 miles or so south of Miami, Cuba’s past half century is slipping into history, and an unknown future awaits. Whether or not Fidel Castro manages to rally from his life threatening surgery, it is certainly only for the briefest of time. His single-minded rule over the Island’s eleven million citizens is entering the shadows from which it must surely pass into history, and the transition has already begun.

The future beckons all Cubans wherever they are to carefully consider the options just ahead. For much of the past 20 years before I came to Charleston, concern with Cuba and things Cuban have kept me at or near the center of the relations between the United States and Cuba. Though an “Anglo”, I am proud and fond of the many Cuban American friends and associates I have come to know in this period and care as deeply as they do that Cuba chooses the right path for itself.

Which road will its people decide to walk? Both are strewn with the obstacles of Castro’s construction. Isolation, a continued lagging economy, and a society that chooses to be united only in its universal misery lies down one road, while the proven potential of free enterprise engaged in by a free people beckons down the other. It is this second road which holds vast promise for all Cubans.

Those on the island consider this. Until each Cuban is free in their life, their liberty and to pursue their individual happiness, the tremendous potential of the Cuban people and its land will be shackled to another larger economy that subsidizes bare existence. There was inequality and corruption under the Batista regime, but does not the present regime have its corruption? While not approving of the abuses of the Batista era from which we all have learned, at least during his time in office there was the possibility that you could better your and your family’s circumstances in an economy that produced a higher per capita income than most other countries in the hemisphere.

Looking for non market based solutions to the running of your economy will always leave you politically reliant on a “Patron”. Reliance on Russia has been succeeded by a dependence on subsidized oil from Venezuela and will last only so long as you do as Hugo Chavez demands. Is that the future you wish? Will China be next?

While Raul’s succession, particularly if, as rumored, he follows the China model, holds some promise of holding back the tides for a while, his time is likely to be brief. Dr. Jaime Suchlicki at the Institute for Cuban and Cuban American Studies puts it this way. “[Raul] would face significant challenges. A bankrupt economy, popular unhappiness, the need to maintain order and discipline in the population at large, as well as to increase productivity within the labor force….Raul would continue to be critically dependent on the military. Lacking the charisma and legitimacy of his brother, he would also need the support of key party leaders and technocrats within the government bureaucracy.”

Rafael Diaz-Balart, father of our two Congressmen of the same name as well as Univision’s anchor, responded some years ago to my query on Raul’s prospects for being able to stay in control for very long by responding in Spanish “…About as long as an ice cream cone at the school house door!” Rafael, who was my client for a period during the 90’s regrettably, has passed away before being able to see this day. He had much wisdom that could have made a difference in the challenging days ahead.

One additional challenge that doesn’t get mentioned much is the loss of the managerial class that ran Cuba’s economy before Castro and left at the time of The Revolution or in the two substantial boat migrations and daily “bolsa” migration that continues to drain Cuba of those who have both confidence in their own skills and God’s assistance to get them to the United States and a fresh start.

This migration has transformed the island from a mostly white, free enterprise centered economy to one which is heavily mulatto and black. Trained exclusively in socialist ways for the past half century and forbidden to engage in anything but the most basic of free enterprise, they are ill equipped to quickly adjust to a free market reality. For them, any substantial success brings only punishment rather that security. Although Castro deserves credit for his emphasis on universal education and health care, the emphasis on socialist thought as the only approved solution for the problems crippling its economy leaves a potentially explosive situation for those Cubans who inherit his bankrupt economy and have been only awaiting his death to begin to assert their desire for fundamental change.

There are many models from the Eastern Bloc that may prove helpful in tackling the confiscated property issues that confront us before relations between our nations can be fully normalized, but it is clear that the United States will be prepared to come more than half way in achieving normalization. It is also clear those American investments made throughout the pre Castro days were of a higher order of “investment backed expectation” than those found not certain enough to warrant a responsibility by the U.S. government to require their satisfaction when we normalized our relations with China.

The investments in Cuba were made pursuant to an unusually close relationship between our two governments and the active encouragement of their occurring including the stationing of a brigade or more of U.S. Marines at one end of the island in perpetuity. Also the legislation in which I had such a major laboring role and its implementation by our government specifically recognizes a statutory right of recovery. These factors and the strong representation of Cuban Americans in Congress are likely to result in a strong role for the government in fashioning a solution that will be fair for all parties.

Cuban-Americans are red white and blue Americans, and the hyphen is useful only in describing, even in the second generation, their love for the homeland from which they have fled. While most have full lives here, I do expect a number will want to expand their businesses to Cuba and that virtually all of our principle industrial, financial and communication’s enterprises stand eager to invest large sums of both financial and human capital in the Island.

One area in which they may not need much help is hospitality. Cubans are naturally good hosts. The beauty and exotic quality of a Cuban holiday has provided “world class experience” in the hospitality industry for its people. After relatives’ remittances, tourism now must be considered Cuba’s main source of continuing hard currency. Virtually all of those in this area would receive a huge boost from being able to fully realize income commensurate with that earned by those in similar positions in the free world.

I continue to be concerned about the political challenge of the returning Cuban American investor and those who stayed behind who have only known Castroism. Perhaps, both groups equally loving their land and its traditions can find unity in the words of Jose Marti, a poet and hero of Cuba’s attempts to free itself of Spanish rule in the late 19th Century.

Writing in 1891, Marti wrote a poem entitled “Cultivo una Blanca Rosa” which has been translated simply as “The White Rose”. It reflected his goals of fighting for Cuba’s freedom from Spain without the loss of the historical affection between Cubans and Spaniards. The English translation goes like this; “I cultivate a white rose/ in June as in January/ For the sincere friend who shakes my hand frankly./ And for the cruel person/ Who tears out the heart with which I live,/ I cultivate not thistles nor thorns,/ I cultivate a white rose.

Today it laments the loss both in Cuba and abroad between those who remain and those who left and is a token of the affection that yet remains. If both those who went and those who stayed will bring their differing gifts to the task with a sense of what unites them rather than that which divides, the years of bitterness may be lifted.

In exile, Rafael Diaz-Balart formed an association called La Rosa Blanca that celebrated strong individual freedoms and opposition to Castro’s dictatorial rule. Going forward the imagery of the White Rose can be a talisman for those who wish together to construct a firm foundation for a free market Cuba that protects individual right but also is determined to go forward with a strong social conscience and commitment to avoid the mistakes of the past. May that be so! Both our countries would be the beneficiary’s of such an effort.

Copyright © 2007 by Robert E. Freer, Jr. All rights reserved

About the author: Robert E. Freer, Jr. is President of The Free Enterprise Foundation. He is a Visiting Professor, at The Citadel and elected in 2005 to be their first John S. Grinalds Leader in Residence. A regular contributor to the Mercury, He can be reached by E-mail at The Citadel . Copies of his earlier columns can be found The Free Enterprise Foundation.

This article may be republished unedited in its entirety provided that copyright statement and author by-lines are kept intact and unchanged and hyperlinks and/or URLs provided by the author remain active.

If you’d like to contribute an article to this collection please e-mail it for review .

Note: A new article appears about every 2 weeks. Sign up below for our newsletter to get each new article mailed to you the day it is published.

Go to 2006 Business Ethics Articles from Cuban Future